Hi,
Hoping someone in the ETC community can explain something to me... My understanding is that the ETC blockchain is actually the original ETH chain which split off after the DAO attack hardfork - however the underlying algorithm and fundamental technology are (or at least were) orginally identical...
If this is the case, can ETC not just continue to wait, as ETH rolls out more and more improvements, until some future time when ETH is widely used and highly functional, and then ETC can just propose all the same improvements to regain identical functionality (and potentially value?)... Fundamentally if they started out from the same underlying tech, surely the same improvements can be rolled out on both chains (with adequate developer support obviously)?
Does anyone think this might be Greyscale's play? They are obviously smart people with considerable resources - why are they still buying ETC (even as recently as last week) if the chain is useless? I see a future where ETH/ETC regain full interopability with each other again, while remaining distinct chains - a BTC/LTC style relationship perhaps. What are the community's thoughts? Cheers
[link] [comments]
source https://www.icocalendar.today/ethereum-classic/etc-vs-eth-technology
Comments
Post a Comment